Thursday, October 21, 2010
New Laws Old Habits..
Tuesday, October 12, 2010
Violence is not in!
Sunday, July 4, 2010
To Paul the Psychic Octopus!
Wednesday, June 2, 2010
Thank you Dr. Naik!
First of all Dr. Naik, thank you telling people how proud you are of being a fundamentalist and an extremist. I dont know if you are aware Dr. Naik, but we in this country are facing the increase of people with very extremist views. They are not educating or giving proper medical treatment to their wives and children, they are conducting underage marriages outside the official system, they are rejecting modern technology and doing all sorts of religious extremist acts. They have even exploded a bomb in our land. I'm sure they were feeling a bit isolated all this time because the majority of us Maldivians are not extremist, but thank you Dr. Naik, because they are now feeling validated, legitimised and loved by your statements, and I'm sure they feel much more driven to continue their ways. Although regarding this meaning of words business, do you know Dr. Naik that language is very fluid and that meanings change according to its usage? Look at the word hakuru in our language Dr. Naik. If you look at our radheef, it is something that housewives went next door to borrow when they run out of sweetners for their teas, but now its something with totally criminal connotations. But then, usage, context and changing times should be overlooked when making a point and you are such a good point maker, so good job Dr. Naik.
Also, thank you Dr. Naik, for equating Bin Ladin with Nelson Mandela. We totally see the connection between the two. Mr. Mandela promoted values of inclusion, tolerance, love and brotherhood, while Bin Ladin .. erm... quite obviously possess the same values. Now we know that in your statements to NDTV that you do not believe that Bin Laden committed any wrong and you think he was framed. Of course as a self educated intelligent logical person, if you feel all the videos he sent to Al Jazeera supporting acts of terrorism and calling for the indiscriminate death of the Western people is all bogus then we shall believe you. Because we believe you know all. Well done Dr. Naik.
You, and Mini You, in your generosity, cleared up a so many things about women as well. For instance you said those who do not wear the veil are inviting trouble. That makes sense. As does the twin sister story, you know the one, where one twin wears the veil and the other wears the mini skirt? Its all very logical. Although, we must say that in this culture if one twin wears the veil the other one would probably be wearing pants and a top, as mini skirts arent all that common. Or maybe you are talking about the Western countries? Then you might have a situation where one twin wears a veil and the other could wear a mini skirt. But then there are so many women walking around with mini skirts over there she might not get a great deal of attention. Also, the veiled woman would probably get all the attention since, as you quite rightly explained to us, those Western people hate Muslims and they would not leave that poor veiled twin alone. But then, all these actual contexts aside, I'm sure what you said makes more sense. You always do, Dr. Naik.
And then there's your explanation about why two women's testimony is equal to one mans. You explained it so well, as you always do. You said if a surgery needs to be done where two surgeons are required, and there's only one surgeon available you would get two MBBS doctors to make up for the missing surgeon. So two MBBS surgeons = one surgeon. This makes it all so simple. Of course if the surgeon available was female (because you know surprisingly enough there are female surgeons in this world) then would you need 4 MBBS doctors in total or one more surgeon for the female surgeon? Also can two MBBS doctors stand in for a something complicated like neuro surgery? But all these questions do not matter. What matters is that you said it and it must be true. Thank you Dr. Naik.
Furthermore, now who would forget that now infamous incident where you silenced that self proclaimed non Muslim. It was amazing the logic you used, for you are the most logical. The way you told him off for not using the same logic in religion and food? That was fabuloso! Of course, all logical persons use the same logic in making all decisions regarding religion and food and all other things in life. Now we are sure you would use the same logic in say choosing whether, on a certain day, to go para sailing or banana boating, or in deciding how many times you would mention Peace tv in a sermon. And you were also right that we should not question when a doctor gives us a medicine on what it is and what it does. You should blindly follow the doctor whatever he or she gives you, you don't have to know what you are ingesting into your body at all! Its just like how we should blindly follow you without question Dr. Naik, because you know best. Not only do you know best you know everything. You are wonderful, Dr. Naik.
And most of all, we would like to thank you for pointing out how bad all the other religions and non Muslims are. All other religions are nonsensical and all non Muslims are out to get us. And thank you for explaining to us that the main reason to be a Muslim is because all the other religions are so bad and illogical and their followers hate us anyway so there's really no point. Of course we would have thought that a better reason would be not to belittle other religions but to point out all the good things in our religion for there are so many. But then, we should really not think much about these things, for as you said the ordinary people should not really bother to use their brains when there are experts like yourself to explain things to people. Because like you said ordinary people are so mentally deficient that it would be impossible for them to grasp these simple things. We get that Dr. Naik, we really really do.
So finally, again, thank you Dr. Naik. Thank you for being our expert and most importantly thank you for the logic. We shall strive not to be extra smart. Thank you Dr. Naik.
Thursday, May 20, 2010
Questions You Cannot Ask after the Religious Unity Regulation.
How can a government regulate personal beliefs....?
Thursday, May 6, 2010
Take that Aspiring Women Leaders!
People are not aware of the disaster that has been averted, for undoubtedly disaster has been averted. Thankfully, you people have the ever knowledgeable and all illuminating XResistance team to enlighten you. Yes we know, thank God for us! Pat on the back for us!
Let us go back a little bit in time and imagine if there was such a frightful clause in the Parliamentary elections bill! Oh the horror! The Parliament would've been infiltrated by halfwits and incapables. The legislating would've been unimaginably slow, people would address each other by titles to their faces and by profanity to their backs. Parliamentarians will be overly emotional, sulky and threaten to walk out at every other meeting. Heck, they might even change the colour of the Constitution to shocking pink!!! Unfortunately even now we have not rid ourselves of the pesky women in our Parliament. We are watching you Women Parliamentarians, and we are tolerating you as an undesirable element we cannot change, like those ads we had to put up with during the telecasts of Kiyunki Saas Bi Kabhi Bahu Thi. (Did you have Tulsi wanting to run for local councils?? We think not!!)
So, really, take that Aspiring Women Leaders! Dont give us this 50% of the population should have an opportunity to have a say on decisions that affect their lives crap. Tough! So what if you are structurally and financially disadvantaged to get an even field to contest in elections. Boo frikkin hoo! Do we care that community norms and practices and radical religious yellings make it difficult for women to be active in the public domain? Not a bit. And don't give us examples of those women who were given an opportunity to get their foot in the door (like some women who were among those appointed Parliamentarians we used to have) who are now active leaders in their field. They don't count. Plus we don't like acknowledging evidence contrary to our beliefs.
And anyway, the most important thing about the decentralisation bill was not ensuring the participation of the people in decision making, or strengthening the participatory and consultative principles of democracy, or increasing accountability to the people and transparency in governance or even giving special opportunities for disadvantaged groups to have their say. No indeedy! It was about whether the government should be allowed to group administration into Provinces or not, because God forbid that even one letter in our set-in-stone brought-down-from-a-mountain Commandments.. excuse us, Constitution should be disregarded! And that matter has been finally settled. Phew!
So take a bow Parliament! (Or whats was left of it after the walkout). You can take a rest now, you have earned it!
Monday, April 19, 2010
Interpretation Explained (...for dimwits)
Monday, April 12, 2010
TO THINK or NOT TO THINK!!
Tuesday, April 6, 2010
The Rise of the Harassees!
Two hours later, after we woke up from a euphoria induced comatose stupor and collected our wits, we thought hats off to you Haveeru and all its good people. Especially the writer of the report Mr. Hassan. We would kiss you all over if that was not sexual harassment!
Well the point of this article is yet again to recognize the good that is going on in society – like we said at the beginning we are trying to beat Team Negativity. We dont mean over the head with plastic chairs as was demonstrated by our cool MPs and political activists during the entertaining albeit somewhat disillusioning showdown on the artificial beach but over the head with our words and our superior wit and sheer positive thinking (yes we did take a turn for the better since our last glum episode and now feeling collectively peachy-keen-and-dandy).
We wholeheartedly support the bill illegalising sexual harassment. We also appeal to the MPs to ensure that you do consult with people who know more on the issue before the big debate. Yes, yes, we do certainly know that you are all experts in everything too but in addition, perhaps just run the bill by another expert?
One thing that we would also like to say is that while this is very important mainly to women, sexual harassment law should protect all people from unwanted sexual advances. After all, since the removal of the gender bar, we could have a woman president any day now!
Anywhoo, today's a day for celebration so we're all off for smoothies!
Toodles!
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
Annnnnnnddddd we're back!
Monday, March 29, 2010
Temporary Break in Transmission
And not to mention we are also extremely preoccupied figuring out what the frikkin hell we are supposed to be fighting for.....???
Anywhoo, once we get our limbs and brains in co-ordination we shall be back.
And in the meantime FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT!..... for.. erm... something or other...
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
Majlis Medley!
If you're loony and you know it
Knock out someone's teeth!
Crash! Crash!
If you're juve nile and hypocritical
Step on your opponent's feet!
Stomp! stomp!
If you cant see past party politics
Then you surely have to show it
If you're (dis)Honourable and you know it
Let the country take a backseat!
Boo! Boooooooo!
Monday, March 22, 2010
Freedom of Expression Explained (...for dimwits)
So basically the reasons behind freedom to express yourself are constructive, good-for-the-society-and-all-man-and-womankind sort of reasons.
BUT if you hate a certain segment of society, say........ harmonica players! and you just cannot stand them and you want exterminate them, unfortunately expressing this view does not, i repeat NOT, represent freedom of expression. And I'll tell you why. Read very slowly now because this will be very complicated for you.
See, you can have your right of freedom of expression. But harmonica players have their right to life, so wanting to kill em off infringes on their right to live. They are both fundamental human rights alright. So unfortunately for you your right ends where someone else's right begins.
There's also this very inconvenient principle for harmonica player haters. Its called the "harm principle". That principle basically says that limitations can be put on your freedom to express if it includes any harm to others. And lets just agree to agree that death is very harmful for a person.
So, bottom line, moral of the story etc etc: Unfortunately, even though you are entitled to have the opinion that all harmonica players should be killed, executed, exterminated and crushed, you cannot publicly express that opinion because
a) it infringes on the basic rights of harmonica players
b) it might incite harm to harmonica players
c) its not freedom of expression its HATE SPEECH which is illegal in almost all sensible countries and
d) you are pathetic get a frikkin life!!!
Saturday, March 20, 2010
Applause!
Once we got over the initial shock we were extremely happy. Elated. Ecstatic.
And more importantly we are stoked that Dr. Afraashim quite kindly pointed out that some scholars do believe that it is not against the religion for women being heads of state. Heck, even the music banning, child marriage promoting, distinguishedly turban and robe wearing Bilal Philips said its ok to have a woman as leader of the country. However, he warned against it and stated that its not all that advisable to do so.
Actually we perfectly understand! Who is their right might would want to elect a half wit as a president. There will be absolute chaos I tell you! The government will be mismanaged, rule of law will not be upheld, the rate of crime will rise, the economy will deteriorate, governance will be weak, no one will know what they're doing, people will start worshipping strange gods like Fuel Supply Maldives, no one will observe even the smallest rules like stopping your vehicle at a zebra crossing, education system will be weak and health facilities mismanaged, there'll be no confidence in the legal system, and the people'll have complete dissatisfaction with the leadership and they'll be protesting every other day!!!
No, we absolutely CANNOT have that in this country, no way!
But anyway, it was very kind of the Majlis, and we hope that the conditions change for the remaining reservation to be removed as well. We have faith in the Majlis. No, really. Yes.